Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Scapillato
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 08:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tim Scapillato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Everyone so far agrees, a borderline notab case. What does the community think ? Triwbe (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. —Triwbe (talk) 06:58, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. —Triwbe (talk) 07:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —Triwbe (talk) 07:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't see how this is borderline unless one radio interview is considered sufficient to cast doubt on his non-notability. Drawn Some (talk) 09:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, but it took 38 hours for an admin to decide on a WP:CSD#A7. --Triwbe (talk) 15:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, a radio interview would probably make an admin decline a speedy and appropriately so. Drawn Some (talk) 22:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources for a BLP? THen no blp.Bali ultimate (talk) 23:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Bali ultimate. لennavecia 21:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree that the radio interview would be a valid enough source to escape speedy oblivion, but it doesn't meet the expectation of substantial coverage strongly enough to escape AFD. Delete; no real notability demonstrated. Bearcat (talk) 23:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.